Global Warming: The Signs and The Science is a 2005 documentary film on global warming made by ETV, the PBS affiliate in South Carolina, and hosted by Alanis Morissette. The documentary examines the science behind global warming and pulls together segments filmed in the USA, Asia and South America and shows how people in these different locales are responding in different ways to the challenges of global warming to show some of the ways that the world can respond.
Trailer of Global Warming: The Signs and The Science
Suggestions of similar film to Global Warming: The Signs and The Science
There are 8957 with the same cinematographic genres, 2491 films with the same themes (including 43 films with the same 3 themes than Global Warming: The Signs and The Science), to have finally 70 suggestions of similar films.
If you liked Global Warming: The Signs and The Science, you will probably like those similar films :
, 1h5 OriginFrance GenresDocumentary ThemesEnvironmental films, La mondialisation, Films about the labor movement, Documentary films about business, Documentary films about environmental issues, Documentary films about technology, Documentaire sur le monde du travail, Disaster films Rating75% Using interviews and overlays of graphics and text, the film presents the current problems facing industrial agriculture. It explores why in the interviewees' view the current industrial model is not up to the task of feeding the world's people. According to the film every calorie of energy contained in a food source currently takes between 10 and 20 calories of crude oil in the production of fertilizers and transportation to produce, leading to a strong dependence of the cost of food on oil prices. As a result of peak oil and increasing oil prices this dependence will lead to ever increasing food prices. According to the film, this dependence already represents a significant weak-spot in the global food supply chain. Additionally, agriculture is already responsible for 40% of greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change. Furthermore, the film argues that the overuse of inorganic fertilizers has been responsible for the loss of soil fertility and threatens the complete loss of usable soil within the next decades through soil erosion and sinking crop yields. These effects, according to the film, can only be partly mitigated by the increased use of those same fertilizers. The loss of workplaces, the concentration of land in the hands of a few (allegedly a farm closes every 23 minutes in France) as well as the dependence on large corporations are enumerated as side effects of the industrialisation of agriculture since the 1920s. Companies, such as Monsanto and Bayer, control everything from seed stock to fertilizers and the necessary chemical mixes for hybrid plants, thereby controlling the entire supply chain. The film argues that this development was supported through subsidies from the World Bank. Interviews with Vandana Shiva, the founder of the Transition Towns movement Rob Hopkins and various agricultural experts serve to argue this viewpoint. The dependence on crude oil is illustrated through the example of the wholesale food market in Rungis.
, 30minutes OriginUkraine GenresDocumentary, Historical ThemesEnvironmental films, Documentary films about environmental issues, Documentary films about historical events, Documentary films about nuclear technology, Documentary films about technology, Disaster films Rating74% Twenty-five years have passed since Valeriy Starodumov worked as a dosimeter scout in September 1986. Valeriy worked at the epicenter of the explosion, the reactor's operation area, which was the most radioactive part of the site. The protagonist, a direct participant in the operation, went to the roof himself and brought people there after a failed attempt to clear the area with robots. At the government level, it was decided to assign soldiers and cadets of military schools to the task of cleaning the roofs. Unique pictures of the events of 1986 are widely used in the film. "Chernobyl.3828" is dedicated to people who saved the world from the radioactive contamination at the cost of their health and life.
, 1h29 GenresDocumentary, Adventure ThemesEnvironmental films, Documentary films about environmental issues, Disaster films Rating50% An Inconsistent Truth is Valentine's investigation into man-made global warming. The title alludes to Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth. Valentine talks with scientists and politicians who are skeptical of human caused global warming, and explores the culture of the global warming movement; often in a satirical way.
Directed byLuc Jacquet OriginFrance GenresDocumentary ThemesEnvironmental films, Documentary films about environmental issues, Documentary films about nature, Disaster films ActorsMichel Papineschi, Jacques-Yves Cousteau Rating68% Le film retrace la vie et le travail du climatologue et glaciologue Claude Lorius et apporte une réflexion sur l'environnement et le rôle des hommes dans les changements climatiques. Il affirme avec des conclusions scientifiques, tirées des travaux de ses équipes, que le bouleversement climatique est « indiscutablement dû à l'homme ». Le rejet de gaz carbonique dont l'homme est responsable contribue à augmenter la température moyenne autour du globe, toutes les régions étant touchées sans exception. Cela entraîne des cataclysmes de plus en plus dévastateurs.